Continuous governance for the decentralized era

Conviction Voting

A novel continuous decision-making mechanism that allows votes to accumulate weight over time according to a halflife algorithm

What is Conviction Voting?

Conviction Voting is a decision-making process in which voters continuously express their preference by staking tokens in support of proposals. The conviction (weight) of their vote grows over time, and proposals pass when they reach an algorithmically-set threshold.

Continuous Voting

Express your preferences continuously, not just during time-boxed voting periods. Change your vote at any time.

Conviction Growth

Your vote weight grows over time according to a halflife algorithm, giving more influence to long-term community members.

Attack Resistant

Sidesteps sybil attacks and provides collusion resistance through time-weighted mechanisms.

Human-Centric

Captures human needs in temporal data flows, ensuring people remain central to automated systems.

The Halflife Algorithm

Conviction Voting uses an exponential decay function (halflife) to manage how support charges up and down for proposals.

How Conviction Grows

When you start supporting a proposal, your support (conviction) doesn't immediately apply. Instead, it charges up over time according to a halflife function.

  • After 2 days (48 hours): conviction reaches 1/2 of potential value
  • After 4 days: conviction reaches 3/4 of potential value
  • After 6 days: conviction reaches 7/8 of potential value
  • The process continues asymptotically toward full value
Key Parameters

Conviction Growth Rate

Determines how quickly support charges up and down (typically 48 hours halflife)

Spending Limit

Maximum proportion of funds that can be requested by any single proposal (e.g., 10%)

Minimum Conviction

Minimum threshold required for small proposals to prevent spam (typically 2.5%)

Effective Stake

Minimum percent of token supply used to calculate thresholds (typically 20%)

Why Conviction Voting?

Traditional time-boxed voting has shown limited effectiveness in distributed communities. Conviction Voting offers a better alternative for continuous, human-centric decision making.

01

No Time Pressure

Vote whenever you want without coordinating around specific voting periods

02

Reduced Voter Fatigue

Set your preferences once and they persist until you change them

03

Better Signal Quality

Long-term community members have more influence than short-term participants

04

Attack Resistance

Time-weighting makes vote-buying and last-minute coordination attacks less effective

05

Continuous Data

Rich temporal data streams enable responsive and adaptive governance

06

Funds Allocation

Specifically designed from first principles for allocating shared treasury resources